Stealthy moths avoid bats with acoustic camouflage

Publication Type:Journal Article
Year of Publication:2018
Authors:Neil, Shen, Drinkwater, Robert
Journal:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Volume:144
Issue:3
Pagination:1742 - 1742
Date Published:Jan-09-2018
ISSN:0001-4966
Abstract:

Intense predation pressure from echolocating bats has led to the evolution of a host of anti-bat defences in nocturnal moths. Some have evolved ears to detect the ultrasonic biosonar of bats, yet there are many moths that are completely deaf. To enhance their survival chances, deaf moths must instead rely on passive defences. Here, we show that furry morphological specializations give moth bodies and wing joints acoustic stealth by reducing their echoes from bat calls. Using acoustic tomography, echo strength was quantified in the spatial and frequency domains of two deaf moth species that are subject to bat predation and two butterfly species that are not. Thoracic fur determines acoustic camouflage of moths but not butterflies. Thoracic fur provides substantial acoustic stealth at all ecologically relevant ultrasonic frequencies, with fur removal increasing a moth’s detection risk by as much as 38%. The thorax fur of moths acts as a lightweight porous sound absorber, facilitating acoustic camouflage and offering a significant survival advantage against bats.

URL:http://asa.scitation.org/doi/10.1121/1.5067725
DOI:10.1121/1.5067725
Short Title:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
BioAcoustica ID: 
Taxonomic name: 
Scratchpads developed and conceived by (alphabetical): Ed Baker, Katherine Bouton Alice Heaton Dimitris Koureas, Laurence Livermore, Dave Roberts, Simon Rycroft, Ben Scott, Vince Smith