00356nas a2200109 4500008004100000245006200041210006200103300001200165490000700177100001600184856004600200 1982 eng d00aAcoustic communication and baffling behaviors of crickets0 aAcoustic communication and baffling behaviors of crickets a33–440 v651 aForrest, TG uhttps://bio.acousti.ca/zh-hant/node/5314202476nas a2200133 4500008004100000022001400041245009800055210006900153260001600222300001400238490000700252520200700259856007602266 1961 eng d a0005-795900aAggressiveness, Territoriality, and Sexual Behavior in Field Crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae)0 aAggressiveness Territoriality and Sexual Behavior in Field Crick cJan-01-1961 a130 - 2230 v173 a

Most contacts between adult male field crickets involve aggressive behavior by one or both individuals and terminate with the obvious retreat of one individual. Aggressive behavior consists of one or more of several actions: in mild encounters there is either rearing of the forebody, lashing of the antennae, and shaking of the body, or else rearing of the hind body, kicking with the hind legs, and shaking of the body; in intense encounters, antennal lashing and rearing of the forebody are followed by spreading the mandibles, stridulating distinctively, rushing forward, sparring with the forelegs, butting with the head, and grappling, wrestling, or biting with the mandibles. A male is often flipped back or thrown sideways, but mutilation as a result of fighting is rare, and only in the most intense encounters is the winner determined by what seems to be superior strength or fighting ability. The outcomes of most encounters are determined by the relative tenacity of the two males, and the intensity of aggression exhibited is correlated with the length of the fight, continued aggressive activity developing into increasingly severe combat until one male finally retreats. Groups of adult male field crickets caged in small arenas form essentially linear dominance hierarchies which are stable for short periods of time and which can be described in terms of several characteristics: (1) each male dominates all or nearly all of his encounters with males below him in the hierarchy, (2) the total number of encounters by individual males decreases gradually toward the bottom of the hierarchy, (3) the intensity of aggression exhibited during encounters decreases more or less gradually toward the bottom of the hierarchy and the numbers of no-decision and no-aggression encounters and actively homosexual contacts increase, and (4) encounters between males which rank next to each other are usually more intense than encounters between males which are far apart in the hierarchy.

 uhttp://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/10.1163/156853961x0004201910nas a2200133 4500008004100000245011600041210006900157260001600226300001100242490000600253520144700259100001801706856005201724 2011 eng d00aMale Responses to Conspecific Advertisement Signals in the Field Cricket Gryllus rubens (Orthoptera: Gryllidae)0 aMale Responses to Conspecific Advertisement Signals in the Field cAug-01-2012 ae160630 v63 a

In many species males aggregate and produce long-range advertisement signals to attract conspecific females. The majority of the receivers of these signals are probably other males most of the time, and male responses to competitors’ signals can structure the spatial and temporal organization of the breeding aggregation and affect male mating tactics. I quantified male responses to a conspecific advertisement stimulus repeatedly over three age classes in Gryllus rubens (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) in order to estimate the type and frequency of male responses to the broadcast stimulus and to determine the factors affecting them. Factors tested included body size, wing dimorphism, age, and intensity of the broadcast stimulus. Overall, males employed acoustic response more often than positive phonotactic response. As males aged, the frequency of positive phonotactic response decreased but that of the acoustic response increased. That is, males may use positive phonotaxis in the early stages of their adult lives, possibly to find suitable calling sites or parasitize calling males, and then later in life switch to acoustic responses in response to conspecific advertisement signals. Males with smaller body size more frequently exhibited acoustic responses. This study suggests that individual variation, more than any factors measured, is critical for age-dependent male responses to conspecific advertisement signals.

1 aJang, Yikweon uhttp://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.001606302397nas a2200181 4500008004100000022001300041245008400054210006900138260001600207300001600223490000700239520181000246100002902056700002302085700002002108700002102128856006602149 2015 eng d a0960982200aEvolution of a Communication System by Sensory Exploitation of Startle Behavior0 aEvolution of a Communication System by Sensory Exploitation of S cJan-12-2015 a3245 - 32520 v253 a

New communication signals can evolve by sensory exploitation if signaling taps into preexisting sensory biases in receivers [1 ;  2]. For mate attraction, signals are typically similar to attractive environmental cues like food [3; 4; 5 ;  6], which amplifies their attractiveness to mates, as opposed to aversive stimuli like predator cues. Female field crickets approach the low-frequency calling song of males, whereas they avoid high-frequency sounds like predatory bat calls [7]. In one group of crickets (Eneopterinae: Lebinthini), however, males produce exceptionally high-frequency calling songs in the range of bat calls [8], a surprising signal in the context of mate attraction. We found that female lebinthines, instead of approaching singing males, produce vibrational responses after male calls, and males track the source of vibrations to find females. We also demonstrate that field cricket species closely related to the Lebinthini show an acoustic startle response to high-frequency sounds that generates substrate vibrations similar to those produced by female lebinthine crickets. Therefore, the startle response is the most likely evolutionary origin of the female lebinthine vibrational signal. In field crickets, the brain receives activity from two auditory interneurons; AN1 tuned to male calling song controls positive phonotaxis, and AN2 tuned to high-frequency bat calls triggers negative phonotaxis [9 ;  10]. In lebinthine crickets, however, we found that auditory ascending neurons are only tuned to high-frequency sounds, and their tuning matches the thresholds for female vibrational signals. Our results demonstrate how sensory exploitation of anti-predator behavior can evolve into a communication system that benefits both senders and receivers.

1 aHofstede, Hannah, M. ter1 aSchöneich, Stefan1 aRobillard, Tony1 aHedwig, Berthold uhttp://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S096098221501358500625nas a2200145 4500008004100000022001400041245012500055210006900180260001600249300001600265490000800281100002600289700002000315856014400335 2001 eng d a0179-161300aDivergence between the Courtship Songs of the Field Crickets Gryllus texensis and Gryllus rubens (Orthoptera, Gryllidae)0 aDivergence between the Courtship Songs of the Field Crickets Gry cMay-12-2003 a1075 - 10850 v1071 aFitzpatrick, Mark, J.1 aGray, David, A. uhttp://doi.wiley.com/10.1046/j.1439-0310.2001.00730.xhttps://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1046%2Fj.1439-0310.2001.00730.x