02399nas a2200217   4500008004100000022001300041245011300054210006900167260001600236300001400252490000800266520167100274100001401945700001601959700001701975700001701992700001902009700001402028700001602042856012302058       2019                        eng d  a0003347200aPerformance of Doppler shift compensation in bats varies with species rather than with environmental clutter0 aPerformance of Doppler shift compensation in bats varies with sp  cJan-12-2019  a109 - 1200 v1583 a<p>The performance of vocal motor control is crucial for vocal communication; however, its evolution and ecological drivers are largely unknown. Doppler shift compensation (DSC), which has been found only in bats, represents an excellent model for studying the mechanisms and evolution of vocal control. We tested whether species that are more dependent on DSC for pulse&ndash;echo separation have a more precise DSC and whether changes in environmental clutter would result in adjustments in DSC performance. We recorded the echolocation and flight behaviour of the greater horseshoe bat, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum, and the great leaf-nosed bat, Hipposideros armiger, flying through a corridor and a window in turn. The DSC precision in H. armiger was significantly lower than that of R. ferrumequinum; the offset between the reference frequency and resting frequency, however, was not significantly different between the two species. We also studied the DSC of H. armiger flying through windows of different sizes. Their flight speed decreased significantly with reduced window size. However, DSC precision and the offset did not vary significantly with window size. Our results suggest that DSC is more precise in rhinolophids, which have a higher demand for pulse&ndash;echo separation by DSC, than in hipposiderids. Changes in environmental clutter do not necessarily result in adjustments of DSC performance. Functional importance associated with high-performance vocal control may be critical in shaping the precision of vocal control in the course of evolution. Instead, habitat clutter encountered by vocalizing animals may not play an important role.</p>
1 aZhang, Yu1 aLin, Aiqing1 aDing, Jianan1 aYang, Xinyao1 aJiang, Tinglei1 aLiu, Ying1 aFeng, Jiang  uhttps://bio.acousti.ca/content/performance-doppler-shift-compensation-bats-varies-species-rather-environmental-clutter02507nas a2200253   4500008004100000022001400041245012300055210006900178260001600247520173100263653002701994653000902021653001002030653001702040653002102057100001902078700001502097700001602112700001202128700001702140700001602157700002402173856005602197       2019                        eng d  a1435-944800aBats increase vocal amplitude and decrease vocal complexity to mitigate noise interference during social communication0 aBats increase vocal amplitude and decrease vocal complexity to m  cOct-01-20193 a<p>Natural background noises are common in the acoustic environments in which most organisms have evolved. Therefore, the vocalization and sound perception systems of vocal animals are inherently equipped to overcome natural background noise. Human-generated noises, however, pose new challenges that can hamper audiovocal communication. The mechanisms animals use to cope with anthropogenic noise disturbances have been extensively explored in a variety of taxa. Bats emit echolocation pulses primarily to orient, locate and navigate, while social calls are used to communicate with conspecifics. Previous studies have shown that bats alter echolocation pulse parameters in response to background noise interference. In contrast to high-frequency echolocation pulses, relatively low-frequency components within bat social calls overlap broadly with ambient noise frequencies. However, how bats structure their social calls in the presence of anthropogenic noise is not known. Here, we hypothesized that bats leverage vocal plasticity to facilitate vocal exchanges within a noisy environment. To test this hypothesis, we subjected the Asian particolored bat, Vespertilio sinensis, to prerecorded traffic noise. We observed a significant decrease in vocal complexity (i.e., an increased frequency of monosyllabic calls) in response to traffic noise. However, an increase in the duration and frequency of social calls, as have been observed in other species, was not evident. This suggests that signal simplification may increase communication efficacy in noisy environments. Moreover, V. sinensis also increased call amplitude in response to increased traffic noise, consistent with the predictions of the Lombard effect.</p>
10aacoustic communication10abats10aNoise10aSocial calls10avocal plasticity1 aJiang, Tinglei1 aGuo, Xiong1 aLin, Aiqing1 aWu, Hui1 aSun, Congnan1 aFeng, Jiang1 aKanwal, Jagmeet, S.  uhttp://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10071-018-01235-0