02251nas a2200313   4500008004100000245009200041210006900133520124800202653002801450653001701478653003201495653001501527100002701542700002801569700001801597700002301615700003001638700002201668700002101690700002801711700002201739700002101761700001701782700002801799700002601827700002201853700001901875856004301894       2018                        eng d00aIt's time to listen: there is much to be learned from the sounds of tropical ecosystems0 aIts time to listen there is much to be learned from the sounds o3 a<p>Knowledge that can be gained from acoustic data collection in tropical ecosystems is low-hanging fruit. There is every reason to recordand with every day, there are fewer excuses not to do it. In recent years, the cost of acoustic recorders has decreased substantially(some can be purchased for under US$50, e.g., Hillet&nbsp; al.2018) and the technology needed to store and analyze acoustic data is contin-uously improving (e.g., Corrada Bravoet&nbsp; al.2017, Xieet&nbsp; al.2017). Soundscape recordings provide a permanent record of a site at agiven time and contain a wealth of invaluable and irreplaceable information. Although challenges remain, failure to collect acoustic datanow in tropical ecosystems would represent a failure to future generations of tropical researchers and the citizens that benefit fromecological research. In this commentary, we (1) argue for the need to increase acoustic monitoring in tropical systems; (2) describe thetypes of research questions and conservation issues that can be addressed with passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) using both short-and long-term data in terrestrial and freshwater habitats; and (3) present an initial plan for establishing a global repository of tropical recordings.</p>
10aconservation technology10aecoacoustics10apassive acoustic monitoring10aSoundscape1 aDeichmann, Jessica, L.1 aAcevedo-Charry, Orlando1 aBarclay, Leah1 aBurivalova, Zuzana1 aCampos-Cerqueira, Marconi1 ad'Horta, Fernando1 aGame, Edward, T.1 aGottesman, Benjamin, L.1 aHart, Patrick, J.1 aKalan, Ammie, K.1 aLinke, Simon1 aNascimento, Leandro, Do1 aPijanowski, Bryan, C.1 aStaaterman, Erica1 aAide, Mitchell  uhttp://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/btp.1259302615nas a2200301   4500008004100000245008200041210006900123260001600192300000900208490000600217520172400223653001501947653001201962653002801974653001002002653002202012653001202034653003202046653002202078653001502100653002102115100001902136700002902155700003002184700002802214700002702242856004402269       2017                        eng d00aSpecies Richness (of Insects) Drives the Use of Acoustic Space in the Tropics0 aSpecies Richness of Insects Drives the Use of Acoustic Space in   cJan-11-2017  a10960 v93 a<p>Acoustic ecology, or ecoacoustics, is a growing field that uses sound as a tool to evaluate animal communities. In this manuscript, we evaluate recordings from eight tropical forest sites that vary in species richness, from a relatively low diversity Caribbean forest to a megadiverse Amazonian forest, with the goal of understanding the relationship between acoustic space use (ASU) and species diversity across different taxonomic groups. For each site, we determined the acoustic morphospecies richness and composition of the biophony, and we used a global biodiversity dataset to estimate the regional richness of birds. Here, we demonstrate how detailed information on activity patterns of the acoustic community (&lt;22 kHz) can easily be visualized and ASU determined by aggregating recordings collected over relatively short periods (4&ndash;13 days). We show a strong positive relationship between ASU and regional and acoustic morphospecies richness. Premontane forest sites had the highest ASU and the highest species richness, while dry forest and montane sites had lower ASU and lower species richness. Furthermore, we show that insect richness was the best predictor of variation in total ASU, and that insect richness was proportionally greater at high-diversity sites. In addition, insects used a broad range of frequencies, including high frequencies (&gt;8000 Hz), which contributed to greater ASU. This novel approach for analyzing the presence and acoustic activity of multiple taxonomic groups contributes to our understanding of ecological community dynamics and provides a useful tool for monitoring species in the context of restoration ecology, climate change and conservation biology.</p>
10aamphibians10aARBIMON10aBiodiversity monitoring10abirds10acommunity ecology10ainsects10apassive acoustic monitoring10arapid assessments10aSoundscape10aspecies richness1 aAide, Mitchell1 aHernández-Serna, Andres1 aCampos-Cerqueira, Marconi1 aAcevedo-Charry, Orlando1 aDeichmann, Jessica, L.  uhttp://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/9/11/1096