@article {58172,
	title = {Techniques for distinguishing between impulsive and non-impulsive sound in the context of regulating sound exposure for marine mammals},
	journal = {The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America},
	volume = {147},
	year = {2020},
	month = {Jan-04-2020},
	pages = {2159 - 2176},
	abstract = {<p>Regulations designed to mitigate the effects of man-made sounds on marine mammal hearing specify maximum daily sound exposure levels. The limits are lower for impulsive than non-impulsive sounds. The regulations do not indicate how to quantify impulsiveness; instead sounds are grouped by properties at the source. To address this gap, three metrics of impulsiveness (kurtosis, crest factor, and the Harris impulse factor) were compared using values from random noise and real-world ocean sounds. Kurtosis is recommended for quantifying impulsiveness. Kurtosis greater than 40 indicates a sound is fully impulsive. Only sounds above the effective quiet threshold (EQT) are considered intense enough to accumulate over time and cause hearing injury. A functional definition for EQT is proposed: the auditory frequency-weighted sound pressure level (SPL) that could accumulate to cause temporary threshold shift from non-impulsive sound as described in Southall, Finneran, Reichmuth, Nachtigall, Ketten, Bowles, Ellison, Nowacek, and Tyack [(2019). Aquat. Mamm. 45, 125\&ndash;232]. It is known that impulsive sounds change to non-impulsive as these sounds propagate. This paper shows that this is not relevant for assessing hearing injury because sounds retain impulsive character when SPLs are above EQT. Sounds from vessels are normally considered non-impulsive; however, 66\% of vessels analyzed were impulsive when weighted for very-high frequency mammal hearing.</p>
},
	issn = {0001-4966},
	doi = {10.1121/10.0000971},
	url = {http://asa.scitation.org/doi/10.1121/10.0000971},
	author = {Martin, S. Bruce and Lucke, Klaus and Barclay, David R.}
}
