Lehmann GUC, HELLER KLAUS-GERHARD. Bushcricket song structure and predation by the acoustically orienting parasitoid fly Therobia leonidei (Diptera: Tachinidae: Ormiini).  1998. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s002650050488.

Kuriwada T, Kawasaki R, Kuwano A, Reddy GVP. Mate Choice Behavior of Female Field Crickets Is Not Affected by Exposure to Heterospecific Calling Songs Ginzel M, red. Environmental Entomology. 2020. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/ee/advance-article/doi/10.1093/ee/nvaa034/5818179.

Matthews LP, Fournet MEH, Gabriele C, Klinck H, Parks SE. Acoustically advertising male harbour seals in southeast Alaska do not make biologically relevant acoustic adjustments in the presence of vessel noise.  2020. Available at: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsbl.2019.0795.

Bura VL, Rohwer VG, Martin PR, Yack JE. Whistling in caterpillars (Amorpha juglandis, Bombycoidea): sound-producing mechanism and function.  2011. Available at: http://jeb.biologists.org/cgi/doi/10.1242/jeb.046805https://syndication.highwire.org/content/doi/10.1242/jeb.046805.

Campbell P, Arévalo L, Martin H, et al. Vocal divergence is concordant with genomic evidence for strong reproductive isolation in grasshopper mice ( Onychomys               ).  2019. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ece3.5770https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ece3.5770https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ece3.5770https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full-xml/10.1002/ece3.5770.

Höbel G, Schul J. Listening for males and bats: spectral processing in the hearing organ of Neoconocephalus bivocatus (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae).  2007. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00359-007-0245-7.

Pollack GS, Faulkes Z. Representation of behaviorally relevant sound frequencies by auditory receptors in the cricket teleogryllus oceanicus. Journal of Experimental Biology 1998 Jan;201 (Pt 1):155-63. 1998;201:155-163.

Legett HD, Page RA, Bernal XE. Synchronized mating signals in a communication network: the challenge of avoiding predators while attracting mates.  2019. Available at: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2019.1067.

Schmidt AKD, Riede K, Römer H. High background noise shapes selective auditory filters in a tropical cricket.  2011. Available at: http://jeb.biologists.org/cgi/doi/10.1242/jeb.053819https://syndication.highwire.org/content/doi/10.1242/jeb.053819.

Stratman KD, Höbel G. Opportunity for female choice in the wild is frequently curtailed by low male trait variation in Hyla versicolor.  2019. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00265-019-2666-z.

Schmidt AKD, Römer H. Functional relevance of acoustic tracheal design in directional hearing in crickets. The Journal of Experimental Biology. 2016;219(20):3294 - 3300. Available at: http://jeb.biologists.org/lookup/doi/10.1242/jeb.145524https://syndication.highwire.org/content/doi/10.1242/jeb.145524https://syndication.highwire.org/content/doi/10.1242/jeb.145524.

Jiang T, Guo X, Lin A, et al. Bats increase vocal amplitude and decrease vocal complexity to mitigate noise interference during social communication. Animal Cognition. 2019. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10071-018-01235-0.

Ronacher B. Innate releasing mechanisms and fixed action patterns: basic ethological concepts as drivers for neuroethological studies on acoustic communication in Orthoptera. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 2019. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00359-018-01311-3.

Grenat PR, Pollo FE, Ferrero MA, Martino AL. Differential and additive effects of natural biotic and anthropogenic noise on call properties of Odontophrynus americanus (Anura, Odontophryinidae): Implications for the conservation of anurans inhabiting noisy environments. Ecological Indicators. 2019;99:67 - 73. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1470160X18309464https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1470160X18309464?httpAccept=text/xmlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1470160X18309464?httpAccept=text/plain.

Yang Y, Zhu B, Wang J, et al. A test of the matched filter hypothesis in two sympatric frogs, Chiromantis doriae and Feihyla vittata. Bioacoustics. 2018:1 - 15. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09524622.2018.1482786https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09524622.2018.1482786.

Aufderheide J, Ronacher B. The impact of age and egg-laying cycle on female grasshoppers? preference functions for acoustic signals. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 2018. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00359-018-1307-8.

S MDEscalon, Simões PIvo, Castroviejo-Fisher S. Neotropical frogs and mating songs: The evolution of advertisement calls in glassfrogs. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 2018. Available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/jeb.13406.

Fouda L, Wingfield JE, Fandel AD, et al. Dolphins simplify their vocal calls in response to increased ambient noise. Biology Letters. 2018;14(10):20180484. Available at: http://rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org/lookup/doi/10.1098/rsbl.2018.0484https://syndication.highwire.org/content/doi/10.1098/rsbl.2018.0484.

Lewis LA, Calambokidis J, Stimpert AK, et al. Context-dependent variability in blue whale acoustic behaviour. Royal Society Open Science. 2018;5(8). Available at: http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/lookup/doi/10.1098/rsos.180241https://syndication.highwire.org/content/doi/10.1098/rsos.180241.

van Staaden MJ, Couldridge V. Female preferences for male calling songs in the bladder grasshopper Bullacris membracioides. Behaviour. 2006;143(12):1439 - 1456. Available at: http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/10.1163/156853906779367035.

Schönrogge K, Barbero F, Casacci LP, Settele J, Thomas JA. Acoustic communication within ant societies and its mimicry by mutualistic and socially parasitic myrmecophiles. Animal Behaviour. 2017;134:249 - 256. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0003347216302822.

Orci KMárk, Iorgu I?tefan. Subspecies-specific song preferences and diverged heterospecific discrimination in females of the bush-cricket Isophya kraussii (Orthoptera: Phaneropterinae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 2017. Available at: http://academic.oup.com/biolinnean/article/doi/10.1093/biolinnean/blx094/4110201/Subspeciesspecific-song-preferences-and-diverged.

Abdelatti ZAS, Hartbauer M. The heterospecific calling song can improve conspecific signal detection in a bushcricket species. Hearing Research. 2017. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378595517302113.

Venator KR, Ryan MJ, Wilczynski W. Responses of male cricket frogs ( Acris crepitans) to attenuated and degraded advertisement calls Koenig W, red. Ethology. 2017;123(5):357 - 364. Available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/eth.2017.123.issue-5.

Cunningham S, Magrath RD. Functionally referential alarm calls in noisy miners communicate about predator behaviour. Animal Behaviour. 2017;129:171 - 179. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0003347217301586.

Fernandez MSA, Vignal C, Soula HA. Impact of group size and social composition on group vocal activity and acoustic network in a social songbird. Animal Behaviour. 2017;127:163 - 178. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0003347217300854.

Bastian A, Jacobs DSteve. To seek or speak? Dual function of an acoustic signal limits its versatility in communication. Animal Behaviour. 2017;127:135 - 152. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0003347217300775.

Bailey NW, Hennig RM. Divergent mechanisms of acoustic mate recognition between closely related field cricket species ( Teleogryllus  spp.). Animal Behaviour. 2017;130:17 - 25. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0003347217301823.

Dorado-Correa AM, Goerlitz HR, Siemers BM. Interspecific acoustic recognition in two European bat communities. Frontiers in Physiology. 2013;4. Available at: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphys.2013.00192/abstract.

Sueur J, Aubin T. When males whistle at females: complex FM acoustic signals in cockroaches. Naturwissenschaften. 2006;93(10):500 - 505. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00114-006-0135-9.

Gray DA, Banuelos C, Walker SE, Cade WH, Zuk M. Behavioural specialization among populations of the acoustically orienting parasitoid fly Ormia ochracea utilizing different cricket species as hosts. Animal Behaviour. 2007;73(1):99 - 104. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0003347206003939.

Bastian A, Jacobs DSteve. To seek or speak? Dual function of an acoustic signal limits its versatility in communication. Animal Behaviour. 2017;127:135 - 152. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0003347217300775.

Riede K. No phenotypic signature of acoustic competition in songs of a tropical cricket assemblage. Behavioral Ecology. 2016;27(1):211 - 218. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/beheco/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/beheco/arv141https://academic.oup.com/beheco/article/27/1/211/1744419/No-phenotypic-signature-of-acoustic-competition-in.

Shaw KL, Herlihy DP. Acoustic preference functions and song variability in the Hawaiian cricket Laupala cerasina. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2000;267(1443):577 - 584. Available at: http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/cgi/doi/10.1098/rspb.2000.1040.

Hirtenlehner S. Selective phonotaxis of female crickets under natural outdoor conditions. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 2014;200(3):239 - 250. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00359-014-0881-7.