01750nas a2200157   4500008004100000022001400041245006900055210006800124260001600192520118800208100003101396700003001427700002701457700001801484856009001502       2018                        eng d  a0006-356800aTerrestrial Passive Acoustic Monitoring: Review and Perspectives0 aTerrestrial Passive Acoustic Monitoring Review and Perspectives  cMay-11-20203 a<p>Passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) is quickly gaining ground in ecological research, following global trends toward automated data collection and big data. Using unattended sound recording, PAM provides tools for long-term and cost-effective biodiversity monitoring. Still, the extent of the potential of this emerging method in terrestrial ecology is unknown. To quantify its application and guide future studies, we conducted a systematic review of terrestrial PAM, covering 460 articles published in 122 journals (1992&ndash;2018). During this period, PAM-related studies showed above a fifteenfold rise in publication and covered three developing phases: establishment, expansion, and consolidation. Overall, the research was mostly focused on bats (50%), occurred in northern temperate regions (65%), addressed activity patterns (25%), recorded at night (37%), used nonprogrammable recorders (61%), and performed manual acoustic analysis (58%), although their applications continue to diversify. The future agenda should include addressing the development of standardized procedures, automated analysis, and global initiatives to expand PAM to multiple taxa and regions.</p>
1 aSugai, Larissa, Sayuri Mor1 aSilva, Thiago, Sanna Frei1 aRibeiro, José, Wagner1 aLlusia, Diego  uhttps://academic.oup.com/bioscience/advance-article/doi/10.1093/biosci/biy147/5193506