<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Linke, Simon</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Gifford, Toby</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Desjonquères, Camille</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Six steps towards operationalising freshwater ecoacoustic monitoring</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Freshwater Biology</style></secondary-title><short-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Freshw Biol</style></short-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ecoacoustics</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ecological Monitoring</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">freshwater</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">passive acoustics</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">underwater sounds</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2020</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Feb-01-2021</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/13652427/65/1</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">65</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1 - 6</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;1. Applications in bioacoustics and its sister discipline ecoacoustics have increased exponentially over the last decade. However, despite knowledge about aquatic bioacoustics dating back to the times of Aristotle and a vast amount of background literature to draw upon, freshwater applications of ecoacoustics have been lagging to date.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2.In this special issue, we present nine studies that deal with underwater acoustics, plus three acoustic studies on water‐dependent birds and frogs. Topics include automatic detection of freshwater organisms by their calls, quantifying habitat change by analysing entire soundscapes, and detecting change in behaviour when organisms are exposed to noise.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3.We identify six major challenges and review progress through this special issue. Challenges include characterisation of sounds, accessibility of archived sounds as well as improving automated analysis methods. Study design considerations include characterisation analysis challenges of spatial and temporal variation. The final key challenge is the so far largely understudied link between ecological condition and underwater sound.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4.We hope that this special issue will raise awareness about underwater soundscapes as a survey tool. With a diverse array of field and analysis tools, this issue can act as a manual for future monitoring applications that will hopefully foster further advances in the field.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Linke, Simon</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Gifford, Toby</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Desjonquères, Camille</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tonolla, Diego</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Aubin, Thierry</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Barclay, Leah</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Karaconstantis, Chris</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kennard, Mark J.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rybak, Fanny</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sueur, Jerome</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Freshwater ecoacoustics as a tool for continuous ecosystem monitoring</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">anthropogenic noise</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">fishes</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">freshwater</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">macroinvertebrates</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">monitoring</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">physicochemical</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2018</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">03/2018</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1779</style></url></web-urls></urls><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Abstract&lt;br /&gt;
	Passive acoustic monitoring is gaining popularity in ecology as a practical and non‐invasive approach to surveying ecosystems. This technique is increasingly being used to monitor terrestrial systems, particularly bird populations, given that it can help to track temporal dynamics of populations and ecosystem health without the need for expensive resampling. We suggest that underwater acoustic monitoring presents a viable, non‐invasive, and largely unexplored approach to monitoring freshwater ecosystems, yielding information about three key ecological elements of aquatic environments &amp;ndash; (1) fishes, (2) macroinvertebrates, and (3) physicochemical processes &amp;ndash; as well as providing data on anthropogenic noise levels. We survey the literature on this approach, which is substantial but scattered across disciplines, and call for more cross‐disciplinary work on recording and analysis techniques. We also discuss technical issues and knowledge gaps, including background noise, spatiotemporal variation, and the need for centralized reference collection repositories. These challenges need to be overcome before the full potential of passive acoustics in dynamic detection of biophysical processes can be realized and used to inform conservation practitioners and managers.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract></record></records></xml>