<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Baker, Ed</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Vincent, Sarah</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A deafening silence: a lack of data and reproducibility in published bioacoustics research?</style></title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">acoustic vouchers</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">bioacoustics</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">open data</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">reproducibility</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">sound libraries</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2019</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://bdj.pensoft.net/article/36783/</style></url></web-urls></urls><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;A study of 100 papers from five journals that make use of bioacoustic recordings shows that only a minority (21%) deposit any of the recordings in a repository, supplementary materials section or a personal website. This lack of deposition hinders re-use of the raw data by other researchers, prevents the reproduction of a project&amp;#39;s analyses and confirmation of its findings and impedes progress within the broader bioacoustics community. We make some recommendations for researchers interested in depositing their data.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract></record></records></xml>