01757nas a2200097 4500008004100000245004900041210004700090520145100137100002101588856005001609 2003 eng d00aBats and moths: what is there left to learn?0 aBats and moths what is there left to learn3 a

Over 14 families of moths have ears that are adapted to detect the ultrasonic echolocation calls of bats. On hearing a bat, these moths respond with an escape response that reduces their chances of being caught. As an evolutionary response, bats may then have evolved behavioural strategies or changes in call design to overcome the moth's hearing. The nature of this interaction is reviewed. In particular, the role of the echolocation calls of bats in the shaping of the structure, neurophysiology and behavioural responses of moths is discussed. Unresolved issues, such as the structural complexity of the moth's auditory system, the nature of temporal integration and the role of the non‐auditory B cell, are described. Issues in which the interactions between bats and moths may be of more general interest to biologists, such as noise filtering within the central nervous system, protean behaviours and coevolution between predator and prey, are also discussed. The interaction between bats and moths has much to interest general biologists, and may provide a useful model in understanding the neurophysiological basis of behaviour, including protean escape behaviours. The validity of the term coevolution as applied to this system is discussed, as there is no doubt that the auditory system of moths is a response to the echolocation calls of bats, although the evolutionary response of bats to moths is more ambiguous.

1 aWaters, Dean, A. uhttp://www.blackwell-synergy.com/toc/pen/28/401980nas a2200121 4500008004100000245011000041210006900151520151800220100002501738700002301763700002001786856005201806 2019 eng d00aSocial calls of Myotis nattereri during swarming: Call structure mirrors the different behavioral context0 aSocial calls of Myotis nattereri during swarming Call structure 3 a

Swarming is a characteristic behavior of bats that occurs in different social contexts. We studied the swarming behavior of Myotis nattereri at a maternity colony and at an autumn swarming site in South-West Germany by using synchronized sound and video recordings. Swarming was always associated with social vocalizations consisting of four frequently occurring call types. Call type A was a short call with a broadband steep-shallow-steep downward frequency modulation. Call type B consisted of two elements beginning with a broadband upward hooked element followed by a steep frequency modulated element. Call type C showed a characteristic rapid downward-upward-downward frequency modulation. Call type D was a long sinusoidal trill-like call with high variability in signal structure. All call types were recorded at the maternity colony, as well as at the autumn swarming site, but the incidence of each call type differed distinctly between the study sites. At the maternity roost, type A calls were most commonly produced. We found evidence for an individual signature in this call type and suggest that this social call has the function of a contact call in Natterer’s bats. At the autumn swarming site, type D calls were the most common social calls; in contrast, this call type was recorded only twice at the maternity roost. The occurrence of trills mainly at the autumn swarming site and their high variability suggests that trills function as male advertisement calls in M. nattereri.

1 aSchmidbauer, Philipp1 aDenzinger, Annette1 aSakata, Jon, T. uhttp://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.022179202261nas a2200229 4500008004100000245009200041210006900133260001600202520158200218653000901800653001301809653001701822653003001839100001601869700001201885700002001897700001501917700002001932700001401952700001601966856004901982 2018 eng d00aSocial vocalizations of big-footed myotis (Myotis macrodactylus) during foraging0 aSocial vocalizations of bigfooted myotis iMyotis macrodactylusi  cFeb-12-20203 a

Acoustic signals play a crucial role in transmitting information and maintaining social stability in gregarious animals, especially in echolocating bats which rely primarily on biological sonar for navigating in the dark. In the context of foraging without relying on tactile, visual, or olfactory cues, acoustic signals convey information not only on food, but also on ownership and defense of resources. However, studies on such information remain fragmentary. In the present study, we aim to document the social vocal repertoire of Myotis macrodactylus at natural foraging sites. Multiple acoustic analyses and spectrographic classification revealed a rich foraging vocal repertoire comprising 6 simple syllables and 2 composites. Discriminant function analyses associated with a subset‐validation procedure provided an optimal method to spectrographically classify all recorded sounds into different syllable types. Multidimensional scaling of median values of multiple parameters further confirmed notable differences among these syllables in a three‐dimensional space. In addition, Euclidean distance analysis showed that there were some spectral similarities between specific social vocal syllables and feeding buzzes, which implied a potential jamming role. Altogether, the data indicate that bats at foraging sites under natural conditions used variant social vocalizations with different functions in addition to echolocation calls, providing supporting evidence for further work on the function and vocal mechanisms of acoustic communication in mammals.

10abats10aforaging10aSocial calls10aSpectro-temporal features1 aGuo, Dongge1 aLuo, Bo1 aZhang, Kangkang1 aLIU, Muxun1 aMetzner, Walter1 aLiu, Ying1 aFeng, Jiang uhttp://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/1749-4877.1236702894nas a2200313 4500008004100000022001300041245010600054210006900160260001600229300001400245490000800259520179700267653002402064653000802088653001802096653003202114653001302146653001902159653002902178100001902207700002002226700002002246700001702266700001202283700001702295700001902312700001602331856023302347 2018 eng d a0003347200aAcoustic similarity elicits responses to heterospecific distress calls in bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera)0 aAcoustic similarity elicits responses to heterospecific distress cJan-12-2018 a143 - 1540 v1463 a

Frequently, individuals of one species respond to alarm calls produced by another species. This form of interspecies communication can be critical for survival. How animals recognize and respond to heterospecific alarm calls is, however, still poorly understood. This is especially true for bats, which are highly vocal and possess a specialized auditory system. We hypothesized that, among bat species, acoustic similarity between heterospecific and conspecific alarm calls is a key factor that underlies call recognition. However, this ability could also be acquired via associative learning from prior exposure or result from phylogenetic relatedness among caller and receiver species, as shown by others. Here we focused on distress calls of bats as representing a certain type of alarm call. To test our hypothesis, we recorded distress calls of 11 bat species from four families at five different sites. We broadcast the recorded calls to three of these species (Rhinolophus sinicus, Myotis badius and Myotis laniger). For all three species, neither prior exposure (familiarity) nor phylogenetic relatedness explained the variation in the response strength, as measured by echolocation vocalizations of receiver species in response to playback of heterospecific distress calls. In contrast, acoustic similarity, especially in peak frequency, between conspecific and heterospecific distress calls, was positively correlated with response strength in the receiver species. Thus, our findings emphasize that, at least among bats, acoustic similarity is a key factor allowing recognition of heterospecific alarm calls. It remains unclear whether evolutionary, genetic and/or neurophysiological mechanisms entrain an individual to respond selectively to a specific acoustic feature.

10aacoustic similarity10abat10adistress call10ainterspecific eavesdropping10alearning10apeak frequency10aphylogenetic relatedness1 aHuang, Xiaobin1 aMetzner, Walter1 aZhang, Kangkang1 aWang, Yujuan1 aLuo, Bo1 aSun, Congnan1 aJiang, Tinglei1 aFeng, Jiang uhttps://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0003347218303191https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0003347218303191?httpAccept=text/xmlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0003347218303191?httpAccept=text/plain03094nas a2200397 4500008004100000022001300041245005700054210005700111260001600168520180000184653000801984653002301992653001702015653001302032653000802045653002102053653001502074653001702089100002202106700002202128700001802150700001902168700001602187700002502203700003402228700002402262700002302286700001602309700001802325700002602343700002602369700002602395700002502421700001702446856023302463 2018 eng d a0960982200aResource Ephemerality Drives Social Foraging in Bats0 aResource Ephemerality Drives Social Foraging in Bats cJan-11-20183 a

Observations of animals feeding in aggregations are often interpreted as events of social foraging, but it can be difficult to determine whether the animals arrived at the foraging sites after collective search [1, 2, 3, 4] or whether they found the sites by following a leader [5, 6] or even independently, aggregating as an artifact of food availability [7, 8]. Distinguishing between these explanations is important, because functionally, they might have very different consequences. In the first case, the animals could benefit from the presence of conspecifics, whereas in the second and third, they often suffer from increased competition [3, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13]. Using novel miniature sensors, we recorded GPS tracks and audio of five species of bats, monitoring their movement and interactions with conspecifics, which could be inferred from the audio recordings. We examined the hypothesis that food distribution plays a key role in determining social foraging patterns [14, 15, 16]. Specifically, this hypothesis predicts that searching for an ephemeral resource (whose distribution in time or space is hard to predict) is more likely to favor social foraging [10, 13, 14, 15] than searching for a predictable resource. The movement and social interactions differed between bats foraging on ephemeral versus predictable resources. Ephemeral species changed foraging sites and showed large temporal variation nightly. They aggregated with conspecifics as was supported by playback experiments and computer simulations. In contrast, predictable species were never observed near conspecifics and showed high spatial fidelity to the same foraging sites over multiple nights. Our results suggest that resource (un)predictability influences the costs and benefits of social foraging.

10abat10abehavioral ecology10aecholocation10aforaging10aGPS10amovement ecology10anavigation10asociobiology1 aEgert-Berg, Katya1 aHurme, Edward, R.1 aGreif, Stefan1 aGoldstein, Aya1 aHarten, Lee1 aM., Luis, Gerardo He1 aFlores-Martínez, José, Juan1 aValdés, Andrea, T.1 aJohnston, Dave, S.1 aEitan, Ofri1 aBorissov, Ivo1 aShipley, Jeremy, Ryan1 aMedellin, Rodrigo, A.1 aWilkinson, Gerald, S.1 aGoerlitz, Holger, R.1 aYovel, Yossi uhttps://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0960982218312909https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0960982218312909?httpAccept=text/xmlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0960982218312909?httpAccept=text/plain02456nas a2200229 4500008004100000245007100041210006900112260001600181490000600197520170600203653002701909653001801936653001701954653001701971653003201988653003202020653001702052100003102069700002502100700002402125856007702149 2013 eng d00aInterspecific acoustic recognition in two European bat communities0 aInterspecific acoustic recognition in two European bat communiti cJan-01-20130 v43 a

Echolocating bats emit echolocation calls for spatial orientation and foraging. These calls are often species-specific and are emitted at high intensity and repetition rate. Therefore, these calls could potentially function in intra- and/or inter-specific bat communication. For example, bats in the field approach playbacks of conspecific feeding buzzes, probably because feeding buzzes indicate an available foraging patch. In captivity, some species of bats recognize and distinguish the echolocation calls of different sympatric species. However, it is still unknown if and how acoustic species-recognition mediates interspecific interactions in the field. Here we aim to understand eavesdropping on bat echolocation calls within and across species boundaries in wild bats. We presented playbacks of conspecific and heterospecific search calls and feeding buzzes to four bat species with different foraging ecologies. The bats were generally more attracted by feeding buzzes than search calls and more by the calls of conspecifics than their heterospecifics. Furthermore, bats showed differential reaction to the calls of the heterospecifics. In particular, <i>Myotis capaccinii</i> reacted equally to the feeding buzzes of conspecifics and to ecologically more similar heterospecifics. Our results confirm eavesdropping on feeding buzzes at the intraspecific level in wild bats and provide the first experimental quantification of potential eavesdropping in European bats at the interspecific level. Our data support the hypothesis that bat echolocation calls have a communicative potential that allows interspecific, and potentially intraspecific, eavesdropping in the wild.

10aacoustic communication10aeavesdropping10aecholocation10afeeding buzz10ainterspecific communication10aintraspecific communication10asearch calls1 aDorado-Correa, Adriana, M.1 aGoerlitz, Holger, R.1 aSiemers, Björn, M. uhttp://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphys.2013.00192/abstract