<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Marina D. A. Scarpelli</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">David Tucker</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Brendan Doohan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Paul Roe</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Susan Fuller</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Spatial dynamics of soundscapes and biodiversity in a semi‐arid landscape</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Landscape Ecology</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">acoustic indices</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">biodiversity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Shrub cover</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Spatial scale</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Subcanopy cover</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Vegetation mosaics</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2022</style></year></dates><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Context&lt;br /&gt;
	Semi-arid landscapes are naturally hetero- geneous with several factors influencing this varia- tion. Fauna responses and adaptations vary in xeric environments, and the scale of observation is impor- tant. Biodiversity monitoring at several scales can be challenging, and acoustics are an alternative to this issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Objectives&lt;br /&gt;
	We investigated how audible biodiver- sity is influenced by environmental factors (e.g.: veg- etation metrics, climatic variables, etc.) across a fine spatial scale, aiming to provide a better understand- ing of the variation in audible species across record- ing locations placed close together. These results will improve the current knowledge on ecoacoustics as a tool for measuring ecological processes in this biome, and better inform conservation plans.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Methods&lt;br /&gt;
	We collected data in the semi-arid region in Queensland, Australia placing 24 recorders 200 m apart for 48 h. We also sampled environmental attributes (e.g.: temperature and vegetation structure metrics) and used acoustic indices in a time-series algorithm to categorise sound into classes. Bird spe- cies and feeding guilds were also identified.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Results We found significant differences between proximate sensors, demonstrating that soundscape differences occur across fine spatial scales. Birds and insects were the predominant biophonic sound observed and both groups were associated with shrub cover and subcanopy height. Environments with higher shrub and subcanopy cover had a higher per- centage of all birds&amp;rsquo; feeding guilds and insects. Sixty- three bird species were identified, including a threat- ened bird species in Queensland.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Conclusion&lt;br /&gt;
	We show biodiversity is influenced by vegetation heterogeneity across fine spatial scales in semi-arid regions, identifying which attributes sus- tain higher levels of biodiversity activity. Our study reveals the practicality of acoustic surveys for this biodiversity monitoring by covering a large area in 48 h. However, we caution that scale is an important consideration when designing surveys.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract></record></records></xml>