Lafaille M, Bimbard G, Greenfield MD. Risk trading in mating behavior: forgoing anti-predatorresponses reduces the likelihood of missing terminalmating opportunities. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 2010;64:1485-1494.

Sugiura S, Takanashi T, Kojima W, Kajiura Z. Squeaking caterpillars: independent evolution of sonic defense in wild silkmoths.  2020. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ecy.3112.

Rothschild M, Haskell PT. Stridulation of the Garden Tiger Moth, Arctia caja L., audible to the human ear.  1966. Available at: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1365-3032.1966.tb00337.xhttps://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1365-3032.1966.tb00337.x.

F. WHITE BUCHANAN. [Letters to Editor].  1877. Available at: http://www.nature.com/articles/015293a0.

Waters DA. Bats and moths: what is there left to learn?.  2003. Available at: http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/toc/pen/28/4.

Bura VL, Rohwer VG, Martin PR, Yack JE. Whistling in caterpillars (Amorpha juglandis, Bombycoidea): sound-producing mechanism and function.  2011. Available at: http://jeb.biologists.org/cgi/doi/10.1242/jeb.046805https://syndication.highwire.org/content/doi/10.1242/jeb.046805.

Dowdy NJ, Conner WE. Characteristics of tiger moth (Erebidae: Arctiinae) anti-bat sounds can be predicted from tymbal morphology. Frontiers in Zoology. 2019;16(1). Available at: https://frontiersinzoology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12983-019-0345-6.

Mora EC, Cobo-Cuan A, Macias-Escriva F, et al. Mechanical tuning of the moth ear: distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and tympanal vibrations.  2013. Available at: http://jeb.biologists.org/cgi/doi/10.1242/jeb.085902https://syndication.highwire.org/content/doi/10.1242/jeb.085902.

Windmill JFrederick, Jackson JCurt, Tuck EJane, Robert D. Keeping up with Bats: Dynamic Auditory Tuning in a Moth.  2006. Available at: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0960982206023219.

Hoy RR, Nolen T, Brodfuehrer P. The neuroethology of acoustic startle and escape in flying insects.  1989.

Lucas KM, Windmill JFC, Robert D, Yack JE. Auditory mechanics and sensitivity in the tropical butterfly Morpho peleides (Papilionoidea, Nymphalidae).  2009. Available at: http://jeb.biologists.org/cgi/doi/10.1242/jeb.032425https://syndication.highwire.org/content/doi/10.1242/jeb.032425.

Bailey WJ. Resonant wing systems in the Australian whistling moth Hecatesia (Agarasidae, Lepidoptera).  1978. Available at: http://www.nature.com/articles/272444a0.

Surlykke A, Michelsen A. Temporal coding in the auditory receptor of the moth ear.  1988. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF00606123.

Waters DA, Jones G. Wingbeat-generated ultrasound in noctuid moths increases the discharge rate of the bat-detecting A1 cell. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. 1994;258(1351):41 - 46. Available at: http://www.royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.1994.0139https://syndication.highwire.org/content/doi/10.1098/rspb.1994.0139.

O?Reilly LJ, Agassiz DJL, Neil TR. Deaf moths employ acoustic Müllerian mimicry against bats using wingbeat-powered tymbals. Scientific Reports. 2019;9(1). Available at: http://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-37812-z.

Møhl B, Miller LA. Ultrasonic clicks produced by the peacock butterfly: a possible bat-repellent mechanism. Journal of Experimental Biology. 1976;64:639?644.

Shen Z, Neil TR, Robert D, Drinkwater BW. The micromechanics and bioacoustic behaviour of Bunaea alcinoe moth scales. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2018;144(3):1775 - 1775. Available at: http://asa.scitation.org/doi/10.1121/1.5067852.

Neil TR, Shen Z, Drinkwater BW, Robert D. Stealthy moths avoid bats with acoustic camouflage. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2018;144(3):1742 - 1742. Available at: http://asa.scitation.org/doi/10.1121/1.5067725.

Brehm G, Fischer M, Gorb S, et al. The unique sound production of the Death?s-head hawkmoth (Acherontia atropos (Linnaeus, 1758)) revisited. The Science of Nature. 2015;102(7-8). Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00114-015-1292-5.

Mikhail A, Lewis JE, Yack JE. What does a butterfly hear? Physiological characterization of auditory afferents in Morpho peleides (Nymphalidae). Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 2018. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00359-018-1280-2.

Sugiura S, Takanashi T. Hornworm counterattacks: defensive strikes and sound production in response to invertebrate attackers. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 2018;123(3):496 - 505. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/biolinnean/article/123/3/496/4850692.

Rosi-Denadai CA, Scallion ML, Merrett CG, Yack JE. Vocalization in caterpillars: a novel sound-producing mechanism for insects. The Journal of Experimental Biology. 2018;221(4):jeb169466. Available at: http://jeb.biologists.org/lookup/doi/10.1242/jeb.169466https://syndication.highwire.org/content/doi/10.1242/jeb.169466https://syndication.highwire.org/content/doi/10.1242/jeb.169466.

Agassiz DJL. Do small ermine moths sing? Possible stridulatory sound production in Yponomeutidae (Lepidoptera). Journal of Natural History. 2017;51(21-22):1229 - 1236. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00222933.2017.1324063https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00222933.2017.1324063.

Hofstede HM ter, Goerlitz HR, Montealegre-Zapata F, Robert D. Tympanal mechanics and neural responses in the ears of a noctuid moth. Naturwissenschaften. 2011;98(12):1057 - 1061. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00114-011-0851-7.

Hofstede HM ter, Goerlitz HR, Ratcliffe JM, Holderied MW, Surlykke A. The simple ears of noctuoid moths are tuned to the calls of their sympatric bat community. Journal of Experimental Biology. 2013;216(21):3954 - 3962. Available at: http://jeb.biologists.org/cgi/doi/10.1242/jeb.093294https://syndication.highwire.org/content/doi/10.1242/jeb.093294.

Barber JR, Kawahara AY. Hawkmoths produce anti-bat ultrasound. Biology Letters. 2013;9(4):20130161 - 20130161. Available at: http://rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org/cgi/doi/10.1098/rsbl.2013.0161https://syndication.highwire.org/content/doi/10.1098/rsbl.2013.0161.

Nakano R, Mason AC. Hearing sensitivity is more relevant to acoustic conspicuousness than to mechanical constraints in crambid moths. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 2017;121(1):174 - 184. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/biolinnean/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/biolinnean/blw029.

Dookie AL, Young CA, Lamothe G, Schoenle LA, Yack JE. Why do caterpillars whistle at birds? Insect defence sounds startle avian predators. Behavioural Processes. 2017. Available at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0376635716303655.

Heller K-G, Krahe R. Sound production and hearing in the pyralid moth Symmoracma minoralis. Journal of Experimental Biology. 1994;187:101?111. Available at: http://jeb.biologists.org/content/jexbio/187/1/101.full.pdf.

Heller K-G, Achmann R. The ultrasonic song of the moth Amyna natalis (Lepidoptera:Noctudidae: Acontiinae). Bioacoustics. 1993;5(1-2):89-97. Available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09524622.1993.9753231.