02887nas a2200181   4500008004100000245007200041210006900113260001600182300001400198490000800212520232400220100002602544700002202570700001902592700002402611700001502635856005502650       2017                        eng d00aDo birds differentiate between white noise and deterministic chaos?0 aDo birds differentiate between white noise and deterministic cha  cJan-12-2017  a966 - 9730 v1233 a<p>Noisy, unpredictable sounds are often present in the vocalizations of fearful and stressed animals across many taxa. A variety of structural characteristics, called nonlinear acoustic phenomena, that include subharmonics, rapid frequency modulations, and deterministic chaos are responsible for the harsh sound quality of these vocalizations. Exposure to nonlinear sound can elicit increased arousal in birds and mammals. Past experiments have used white noise to test for effects of deterministic chaos on perceivers. However, deterministic chaos differs structurally from white noise (i.e., random signal with equal energy at all frequencies), and unlike white noise, may differ dramatically depending on how it is produced. In addition, the subtle structural variation of chaos may not be distinguishable in the environment due to the attenuation and degradation of sound over distance and different habitat types. We designed two experiments to clarify whether American robins (Turdus migratorius) and warbling vireos (Vireo gilvus) discriminate between white noise and deterministic chaos. We broadcast and re-recorded white noise and two exemplars of deterministic chaos&mdash;one generated with a Chua oscillator and the other generated using a logistic equation&mdash;at 1, 10, 20, 30, 40, and 80 m across open and forested habitat and used spectrogram correlations to compare stimuli along this degradational gradient. We found that sounds degraded similarly in both habitats when compared to a reference distance of 1 m. Comparing pairs of stimuli across distances suggested that Chua chaos was more easily distinguishable from noise and logistic chaos. In addition, all stimuli became more distinctive over increased distance. The second experiment tested behavioral responses of robins and warbling vireos to control sounds of tropical kingbird (Quiscalus mexicanus), white noise, and two exemplars of deterministic chaos (Chua and logistic). Neither American robins nor warbling vireos responded differently to at least two types of deterministic chaos and white noise, validating previous playback studies that used white noise as a surrogate for deterministic chaos. Uniform responses to a variety of nonlinear features in these birds possibly reflect error management in alarm signal detection.</p>
1 aBlumstein, Daniel, T.1 aWhitaker, Jessica1 aKennen, Judith1 aBryant, Gregory, A.1 aKoenig, W.  uhttp://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/eth.2017.123.issue-12