Sound reception and radiation in a small insect

Publication Type:Conference Paper
Year of Publication:2012
Authors:Mhatre, Montealegre-Z, Balakrishnan, Robert
Conference Name:Acoustics 2012
Conference Location:Nantes, France
Astratto:

Insects are small; this is a fact of their life. In some contexts this is an advantage, such as insects do not injure themselves through the effects of gravity. In other contexts this is a disadvantage, especially in the context of sound production and reception. The wavelengths of sound that insects such as crickets produce and receive are several times larger than their body size. For sound production, this is particularly challenging and inefficient, as sub-wavelength radiation (size to lambda ratio > 1:100) requires great energy expenditure to produce sufficient sound pressure. In receiving sound, they face the reciprocal problem and are inefficient receivers. In addition,  because of their size they cannot rely on cues other animals use to detect the direction of sound. Nonetheless, sound is extremely important to these insects as they use it for mate attraction and to evade predators. We investigate this problem by combining the technique of microscanning laser Doppler vibrometry with finite element modelling; and explain some of the biomechanical tricks a tiny tree cricket uses to overcome the disadvantages of size.

BioAcoustica ID: 
Taxonomic name: 
Scratchpads developed and conceived by (alphabetical): Ed Baker, Katherine Bouton Alice Heaton Dimitris Koureas, Laurence Livermore, Dave Roberts, Simon Rycroft, Ben Scott, Vince Smith