<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>5</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Blondheim, Syril A.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Factors in the reproductive isolation between &lt;i&gt;Dociostaurus curvicercus&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;D. jagoi jagoi&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;D. genei littoralis&lt;/i&gt;</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Evolutionary Biology of Orthopteroid Insects</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1987</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ellis Horwood</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chichester</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;From a well-documented study of two sympatric sibling species of singing gomphocerine grasshoppers, Perdeck (1958) reached the surprisng conclusion that reproductive isolation between them resulted almost exclusively from differences in acustic behavior. In the present work, comparison of the sibling gomphocerine grasshoppers &lt;em&gt;D. curvicercus&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;D. jagoi jagoi&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;D. genei littoralis&lt;/em&gt; revealed ecographical, temporal, ethological, structural and cytological differences which could account for failure of the species to interbreed.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></section></record></records></xml>