<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ann V. Hedrick</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Female preferences for male calling bout duration in a field cricket</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology</style></secondary-title><short-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Behav Ecol Sociobiol</style></short-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">female preference</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Individual Male</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Potential Mate</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Specific Factor</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tape Recording</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1986</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jan-06-1986</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF00303845</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">19</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">73 - 77</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;The calls of male field crickets attract sexually receptive females. In Gryllus integer, males differ from one another in their durations of uninterrupted calling (calling bout lengths). Tape recordings of the calls of 50 wild-caught males revealed that 14 males spent most of their calling time in short bouts (Fig. 1A), 18 in both short and long bouts (Fig. 1B), and 18 in long bouts (Fig. 1C). Re-recordings of 32 males after 3 weeks showed that calling bout lengths of individual males are stable with time (age) (Fig. 2). Three phonotaxis experiments investigated whether calling bout lengths of males affect female preferences. They demonstrated that (1) females can discriminate among conspecific males on the basis of calls alone; (2) females are preferentially attracted to males with long calling bout lengths; and (3) calling bout length is the specific factor responsible for preferential attraction. These results precisely identify a criterion that females use to discriminate among potential mates of their own species.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Anne S. Leonard</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ann V. Hedrick</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Long-distance signals influence assessment of close range mating displays in the field cricket, Gryllus integer</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Biological Journal of the Linnean Society</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">acoustic signal</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">chemical cues</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">courtship</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">mate choice</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">multimodal signals</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">multiple cues</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">multiple messages</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">redundant signals</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2010</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jan-08-2010</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bij.2010.100.issue-4https://academic.oup.com/biolinnean/article-lookup/doi/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01472.xhttps://api.wiley.com/onlinelibrary/tdm/v1/articles/10.1111%2Fj.1095-8312.2010.01472.x</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">100</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">856 - 865</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Male sexual displays often include components detected across long distances, and those perceived only at close range. Understanding what information females gain from each component of a complex display and how they use these signals to make decisions are questions of major interest in sexual selection research. We evaluated content-based hypotheses (&amp;lsquo;redundant signals&amp;rsquo; and &amp;lsquo;multiple messages&amp;rsquo;) for the courtship displays of field crickets (Gryllus integer) by measuring female responses to males&amp;rsquo; long-distance calling song (calls) and close-range chemical cues. Females&amp;rsquo; responses to a male&amp;rsquo;s calls and chemical cues were uncorrelated, supporting the &amp;lsquo;multiple messages&amp;rsquo; hypothesis. We also tested the &amp;lsquo;inter-signal interaction&amp;rsquo; hypothesis by investigating how long-distance calls influence evaluation of close-range courtship. The relationship between long- and close-range signals was complex and conditional: females accepted close-range courtship more quickly after exposure to attractive calling song than they did after exposure to either unattractive calling song or silence, and unattractive calls were no more or less effective than silence. This inter-signal interaction could affect our understanding of mate choice in species with multiple mating signals because it implies that females may save time and energy by not assessing the close-range signals of attractive long-distance signalers.&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></issue></record></records></xml>