—recordings
—taxa
—traits
—annotations

Listen to the
living world

BioAcoustica is a free, open repository of wildlife sound recordings from the Natural History Museum, London.

Browse by taxon

Taxonomic index of the BioAcoustica collection

Loading taxa…

Browse traits

Acoustic and biological measurements in the BioAcoustica collection

Browse annotations

Recording annotations from ann-o-mate

Browse specimens

The specimens that recordings are of, from the collections

Morphological determinants of carrier frequency signal in katydids (Orthoptera): a comparative analysis using biophysical evidence

#50909 · bio.acousti.ca · Journal Article

Citation

Montealegre-Zapata, Fernando; Ogden, Jessica; Jonsson, Thorin; Soulsbury, Carl D. (2017). Morphological determinants of carrier frequency signal in katydids (Orthoptera): a comparative analysis using biophysical evidence. Journal of Evolutionary Biology.

Abstract

Male katydids produce mating calls by stridulation using specialized structures on the forewings. The right wing (RW) bears a scraper connected to a drum-like cell known as the mirror and a left wing (LW) that overlaps the RW and bears a serrated vein on the ventral side, the stridulatory file. Sound is generated with the scraper sweeping across the file, producing vibrations that are amplified by the mirror. Using this sound generator, katydids exploit a range of song carrier frequencies (CF) unsurpassed by any other insect group, with species singing as low as 600 Hz and others as high as 150 kHz. Sound generator size has been shown to scale negatively with CF, but such observations derive from studies based on few species, without phylogenetic control, and/or using only the RW mirror length. We carried out a phylogenetic comparative analysis involving 94 species of katydids to study the relationship between LW and RW components of the sound generator and the CF of the male's mating call, while taking into account body size and phylogenetic relationships. The results showed that CF negatively scaled with all morphological measures, but was most strongly related to components of the sound generation system (file, LW and RW mirrors). Interestingly, the LW mirror (reduced and non-functional) predicted CF more accurately than the RW mirror, and body size is not a reliable CF predictor. Mathematical models were verified on known species for predicting CF in species for which sound is unknown (e.g. fossils or museum specimens).

Taxa

Acanthacara acuta
Ancistrocercus (Ancistrocercus) circumdatus
Ancistrocercus (Ancistrocercus) excelsior
Arachnoscelis arachnoides
Artiotonus artius
Artiotonus captivus
Artiotonus tinae
Balboana tibialis
Championica (Auchenacophora) walkeri
Chibchella nigrospecula
Chondroderella borneensis
Conocephalus (Anisoptera) saltator
Copiphora brevirostris
Copiphora gorgonensis
Copiphora gracilis
Copiphora rhinoceros
Daedalellus waehnerorum
Diacanthodis granosa
Docidocercus chlorops
Docidocercus gausodontus
Docidocercus gigliotosi
Drepanoxiphus angustelaminatus
Neoconocephalus affinis
Panacanthus cuspidatus
Panacanthus gibbosus
Panacanthus intensus
Panacanthus lacrimans
Panacanthus pallicornis
Panacanthus varius
Panoploscelis specularis
Parascopioricus cordillericus
Pemba cochleata
Phlugis poecila
Phymonotus jacintotopos
Pristonotus tuberosus
Promeca perakana
Promeca sumatrana
Ragoniella pulchella
Scopiorinus carinulatus
Scopiorinus impressopunctatus
Scopiorinus mucronatus
Stetharasa exarmata
Supersonus aequoreus
Supersonus piercei
Supersonus undulus
Teleutias akratonos
Teleutias castaneus
Teleutias fasciatus
Tettigonia viridissima
Trichotettix pilosula
Triencentrus atrosignatus
Tympanophyllum (Tympanophyllum) arcufolium
Typophyllum bolivari
Typophyllum egregium
Typophyllum erosifolium
Typophyllum morrisi
Typophyllum mortuifolium
Typophyllum onkiosternum
Typophyllum trapeziforme
Typophyllum zingara
Uchuca amacayaca
Uchuca halticos

Recordings map

Where the specimens that recordings are of were collected, not where the sound was recorded

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
API 0